Sumber: MalaysianInsider. |
MalaysianInsider melaporkan:
K Pathmanathan, now known as Mohd Ridzuan Abdullah, told The Malaysian Insider this morning that he had already filed a notice of appeal to the court and an application for a stay of execution of yesterday’s High Court order for him to return 23-month-old Prasana Diksa to the mother.Mungkin ramai yang tak tau, aku pun taktau, sebenarnya kes ni dah dibicarakan di mahkaman syariah. Mahkamah syariah 8 April tahun lepas dah pun buat keputusan menyerahkan hak penjagaan nak-anak tu kepada Mohd Ridzuan.
“The court has already fixed the date to hear the stay of execution application on March 25,” he said.
In the meantime, Mohd Ridzuan said he had no intention to give up Prasana, adding that he did not care if “they come and kill me”.
“At this point, I do not care about anyone. All I want is for my children to be with me. I am only concerned about them,” he said.
The couple have two other daughters — Tevi Darsiny, 13, and Karan Dinish, 12.
He refused to reveal details current whereabouts of Prasana but claimed that she was in the safe hands of school authorities in Kelantan, where he resides. - MalaysianInsider
Masalahnya la ni dua mahkamah berseza mengeluarkan keputusan yang berbeza. Mahkamat Syariah memihak kepada Mohd Ridzuan manakala mahkamah tinggi pulak memihak kepada Indera.
Lebih menambah masalah bila kedua-dua mahkamah ni sama taraf dan tak boleh mencampur urusan satu sama lain. Pihak berkuasa nak jalankan keputusan yang mana. Kalau ikut undang-undang sivil, sapa-sapa yang engkar arahan mahkamah boleh dikenakan tindakan, tapidalam masa yang sama mahkamah syariah pula membenarkan tindakan tu.
Yang sikit melegakan bila MalaysianInsider melaporkan:
In the meantime, Mohd Ridzuan said he had no intention to give up Prasana, adding that he did not care if “they come and kill me”.
Nota kaki
Media Pengiklanan Baru
Baca Email dapat cash
Iklan text di sini, cuma RM10